realitaetsverlust

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ThSgB4WJD8I

Future codebases gonna be a disaster, almost no one will actually know all of the code anymore.

That’s a bunch of bullshit tbh.

The reason why microsoft is going to shit with AI is because they force it down their developers throat. Hell, people get reprimanded because they don’t use enough tokens each month. And yes, if you’re forced to shove AI down everything, it’s going to be shit.

Debian isn’t going to end up like microsoft because debian isn’t forcing it’s use. So people use it where it’s going to be useful and if it results in shitty code, well, a maintainer will most likely spot it. Debian is famed for it’s stability and pretending like their liberal stance on LLMs is going to change that is nonsense.

Literally no. That is what your argument did and still does stand on. Plausibility, not fact. You’ve proven a remote existed.

Okay - so we know there’s a remote. We also know he was reasonably angry at the dog, and we know he reached towards something, then the dog yelped. And you don’t think that’s enough “coincidences” to no longer be a coincidence? Are you just willfully ignorant at this point? Because if that’s the case, any further discussion is indeed futile.

So you admit that I’m correct.

No, I don’t, that’s something you just pulled out of your ass.

You claim things as fact with no evidence

With no direct evidence - yes. There’s a difference between “no direct evidence” and “no evidence at all”. But guess what - if enough coincidences come together, they form evidence. In most murder cases, you never know if the TRULY killed the person, but you have finger prints, you have a lack of an alibi, you have a motive etc. All that comes together as a case. It’s not like if nobody sees you literally putting the knife into the chest, you’re gonna be free.

There’s a lot of things we know happened but aren’t sure. Hell, we don’t know for sure if the 1985 beirut bombing was truly a CIA op, as some later investigations considered. There’s also no actual evidence of trump ACTUALLY fucking kids on epstein island - but (and that’s one of the few things we agree on in this entire discussion) I think that all the coincidences and relations come together and form a pretty conclusive picture.

And I think that in the hassan case, there’s just too much “coincidences” to still be considered coincidence.

My dog has yelped for seeming no reason before. He’s also slipped on a step and yelped before. He’s also gotten his nail stuck on his kennel before and yelped. Again. Inconclusive. We cannot know. But I guess you do with no evidence?

The dog yelping in a vacuum wouldn’t be a problem. Again - it comes together with hassan being angry with his dog AND him reach off screen. That’s what forms the evidence.

You’ve already admitted you’re a bad faith actor. You admitted previously that no matter what Hasan says you will discredit it.

I don’t think I am. I barely knew about the guy before the dog incident, the only time I heard about it was because LTT was building a PC for him lol. But yes, you’re right - I don’t believe the word of the guy because of course he would try to defend himself to save his reputation.

You then try to claim “conclusive” evidence

I think, if we look at the entire situation and how it happened - it’s fairly conclusive.

Then, something would come out, perhaps that the collar is not a shock collar for example

Okay, but where is that “something”. There is no something. He claimed it was a “vibration collar”, which has been debunked already because people found the exact brand of the device he was using, and it’s a shock collar. And there has been no something since.

And attempting to treat claims as verified fact while these remain inconclusive is bad faith.

No, it’s really not. The combination of multiple claims can be evidence, as I’ve stated multiple times by now.

However, tl;dr: I believe the video and the order of events in the video fit to him using a shock collar, you don’t. Any further discussion regarding this topic is just kinda pointless as we’re just going in circles. I will refer to the video, you will say: “Well we don’t know what he did off camera.”. I’m not sure if you are genuinely not sure and you want to give him the benefit of the doubt or you know damn well what he did, but that would make a big supporter of your political agenda look bad.

Whatever you do with this, have a nice rest of the day! :)

Holy shit the only thing you’re trying to stand on is that you can’t know for sure what he did off camera? Well what will it fucking be, he pushed a button on the remote to activate the collar. There have even been streams where the remote was in plain view. I found the clip, sadly it’s from xQc who’s a dumbass himself, but all we need is the video, or actually the thumbnail is enough: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8f2LmnmI5sI

So we know there’s a remote. Now how far fetched is it he used that remote, which in turn causes the dog yelp.

I’ve not called you stupid either,

Yes, you have repeatedly called me stupid, or a “nicer variation” of it. At least stand by what you say.

I did call you a eurocuck betamale. Which, statistically, still holds and you didn’t refute it so

Yes, because it’s the cringiest shit you could’ve said and I didn’t think it relevant to the discussion as it’s yet another ad hominem attack. I also thought this alpha/betamale shit is something andrew tate and these other clowns are spouting, but funny to see it has seen use in your vocabulary aswell.

I stood on information, evidence

No you didn’t lmao. Not a single shred of evidence.

You posted one news about ethan klein, one journalistic opinion without any evidence either and then referenced the violence towards hassan, which I have condemned myself, but doesn’t change anything about the situation itself. There is no evidence here. Now, one might say I don’t have any evidence either, which is certainly true, however, I think that my version of events holds up better if compared to the video. You think the dog just yelped for fun at that point in time?

testimony

Yeah, one by hassan himself, and the other by ethan klein, who’s just guessing and I’m not sure how he gets to his conclusion, but mine is different.

and the same clips you tried to say “just go watch bro.”

You have not referenced the clip ONCE. All you have done is called me stupid, referenced completely irrelevant points on the side like my opinion on bodycams and when I said I’m not watching an irrelevant 23 minute video, you called me stupid again. Like, what are you even doing man.

Also, how much time have you wasted here?

Roughly 30 minutes I’d say, I’m just checking in every now and then during deadlock queue time.

This “LLM” is certainly more evidenced and principled than you

Well, this LLM is certainly hallucinating like a champ, but that’s the only thing you’re doing well.

Provides no evidence, just says “lol bro no” as evidence and repeats unproved claims as fact.

Bro just watch the video? What more evidence do you need or want?

Can’t read or listen, makes sense.

Because I’m not wasting 23 minutes of my life watching a completely irrelevant video on bodycam problems in the US? Why would I give a shit about that. That’s not even relevant. You haven’t even responded to any of my answers to the questions you gave lmao. You don’t even care - you just looking for ways to declare me “stupid” in your little world so you don’t have to actually have any arguments.

No need to engage further, you’ve got nothing to stand on.

You’ve never had a single leg on the ground in this entire conversation. I told you multiple times: “There’s the original video where X happens” and you never even acknowledged it. It’s actually insane how ignorant you are, pretending you are in the right. Honestly you sound more like a malfunctioning LLM with god complex than a human being ngl.

Ah fuck you could’ve just lead with that, then I had remembered who you are and had never bothered to answer lmaoo.

Brother, I said shock collars don’t work on breeds like that given that the contacts have trouble making contact.

Which is factually wrong - there are collars that offer interchangeable contacts so you can adjust it for different dog breeds.

You’ve got Hasan’s statement, which you obviously discredit entirely as you’ve determined he’s guilty already

You’d be absolutely correct on that.

And further, the pushing of this narrative has led to threats against Hasan himself as well as threats to kidnap Kaya.

Which is obviously wrong, but doesn’t make it a better situation lmao.

If you trust video evidence infallibly, you probably trust police bodycam as it could never be interpreted or abused to support a narrative counter to what actually occured, right? Right?

Well, yes. I’m not very familiar with how bodycams are used in america, but if we’re looking at the entire situation and not just a small section that is misrepresented, I would absolutely trust the video evidence. To be fair, these days, it’s a lot harder to tell with AI running rampant, but that’s a non-factor in this case in particular as AI wasn’t that powerful back when this happened.

I’m not watching a 23 min video tho, sorry.

But go on, what have you got?

I mean, I have the original clip. You can find it on youtube aswell. He says: “Kaya, please, just fucking go back”, does something off camera with his hand and then the dog yelps and goes back on his bed. There’s nothing “inconclusive” about it.

In all seriousness, idk what to tell you. If you want to believe he’s innocent, you do you. I think it’s sad that you excuse animal cruelty just because he’s presumably on your side of the political spectrum, but I gotta tell you that you’re not that far away from those people that excuse epstein and his friends because they like trump.

Difference is my inference is based on logic

Ah yes. Of course.

yours is based on a bunch of online people repeating the same false talking point, whether it be Destiny, Asmon, or whoever.

No, it’s based of me seeing a clip of hassan, being mad at his dog, pushing a button of screen and then hearing his dog yelp. Ironically, the first time I really heard about this is because someone made an AI song about it, and that led me to finding more context to it, which I eventually found.

you lack the intellectual capacity to actually do any research or fact finding yourself and just repeat the slop from these sources.

I actually laughed while reading this ngl, shit made me crack up. Nothing funnier than some chronically online clown talking down to other people.

And you’re getting defensive about it as you’re rightfully attacked for not doing the bare minimum of fact checking literally anything.

That is a fucking WILD statement coming from you, who’s only defense is: “ITS A RIGHT WING TALKING POINT!!! PLEASE STOP SPREADING RIGHT WING TALKING POINTS!!!”. But I get it, it’s convenient. You can just pretend those don’t exist or are all made up and can think of yourself as morally superior, even tho you can just search for the simple terms: “hassan dog” and you will find the original clip lmao. You’d probably defend big yahu himself if he’d just support your political agenda.

Shock collars aren’t abusive

That’s even true. There’s legitimate reasons to use shock collars. However, forcing your dog to stay on the same spot isn’t one of them. That’s animal abuse.

Do you realize how stupid you look to people who have actually watched an Hasan stream before?

I genuinely couldn’t give a shit about the opinions of people who actively watch an animal abuser tbh. There’s a live clip of the situation yet you will still sit here and deny it which is absolutely insane, but then again - your choice to be a shitty human I guess.

It’s genuinely funny, you know that I’m not american, yet you will automatically assume that I have to watch asmongold just because I dislike hassan, as if every human on the planet HAS to watch either of these two dumbasses. Because there’s no other content creators on gods green earth and every human on the planet MUST be involved in the american culture war, right?

Very cool, nice to see you are successfully coping with the fact that animal abuse is perfectly fine for you as long as the person has the same political opinion as you do.

We found the eurocuck betamale Asmeinkampf watcher.

Might be hard for you to understand, but not everyone is american. I couldn’t give two shits about the political problems over there. I got enough in my own country.

However, what I do see is that you are supporting a dog torturer simply because he has the same political stance as you do, which makes you pretty despicable tbh.

why aren’t you protesting the companies that make shock collars?

Because there’s legit reasons to use shock collars.

Or adopting animals from shelters that are overflowing right now because of the depression most of us are in?

Because I already have 4 dogs, 3 from a shelter, and I don’t have any more capacity. I can’t save the world alone. Hell, if you wanna fund me with a couple million bucks, I can buy a larger piece of land and take care of abandoned dogs full time for the rest of my life. If you can’t do that, well, I don’t have the financial means to do that either.

It’s pushing a narrative.

Which narrative am I pushing? Not mistreating animals?

Lmaooo, “don’t use a shock collar on your dog live on stream because he didn’t lie on his spot for 12 hours where he’s nicely positioned in the camera” is a right wing talking point to you. You need fucking help mate.

I also don’t know why you bring politics into this. I’m not american. I couldn’t give two fucking shits about hassans political stance. All I see is an asshole who’s torturing an animal live on stream and people defending it with a: “Oh No ItS a RiGhT wInG tAlKiNg PoInT.”

Some news for you, just because someone has the same political opinion as you doesn’t mean he’s a good person by default. And if you defend their heinous actions, I got some more news for you: Neither are you.

Bro is using a shock collar live on stream to force his dog to lie still in the back of the room for 12 hours, yet delusional people like you will somehow pull off the mental gymnastics to justify it.

I can barely express how much I despise this asshole. He bought that dog solely to be a stream decoration.

Arch was the “elite” distro. Most people who weren’t already very comfortable with the terminal were even able to use arch properly. Stuff like archinstall didn’t exist back then and those that did were way inferior than what we have today. So using arch was like a “badge of honor” of sorts for many people who thought using it made them superior to disgusting ubuntu or mint users with their GUI installer.

It’s just classic gatekeeping that you’ll see in basically everything that comes with a passionate community.

Where are those people whose arch installs break after every second update? I don’t think I had a single problem with arch that I wasn’t responsible for. Hell, I had more problems with mint on my girlfriends PC than the arch machines that I’m running.

I don’t mean this in any mean way, but if you don’t know what you should be looking for, you probably shouldn’t install AUR packages. Just as I wouldn’t recommend someone who has never climbed a mountain to try mt everest.

You need to be able to understand the build process before you install anything from the AUR. Everything else is the equivalent of installing random exe’s you found on a forum on windows.

Luckily, there’s a lot of different videos online regarding the AUR build process, and the archwiki has an excellent article aswell.

If you stereotype people based on their skincolor, that is racism.