It shouldn’t be that hard. Use Shellcheck to check for mistakes. Good luck!
toman
- 1 Post
- 7 Comments
toman@lemmy.zipto
Linux@lemmy.ml•The dangerous push by Canonical to rewrite GNU coreutils as Rust code without the GNU licenseEnglish
201·1 year agoRust’s licensing is also problematic. The license has been worded in such a vague way that it may or may not allow forking or re-implementation. It may or may not require deleting all references to the word “rust” from a fork or re-implementation.
All of that is fully compatible with FSF and OSI definitions. There is nothing new in requirement that forks use a different name.
To add to this: Rust is dual-licensed under the MIT and Apache licenses, both of which are permissible and compatible with GPLv3. There’s nothing stopping anyone forking Rust and creating Stallman’s Rust licensed under GPLv3. I genuinely do not understand that paragraph.
That sounds cool as heck! But I am very confused about how television broadcasting works in the UK. This only works with some sort of over-the-internet TV, right?
I use an adblocker on both my PC and my phone. Does a Pi-hole have many advantages over that?
The Czech translation of “mammals” is savci, the Slovak translation is cicavce, and the Polish translation is ssaki. All of these (to my knowledge) literally mean suckers, because we like sucking tits.


plan9