It is a message that there is no smoke without fire. The “intellectual” (note the glasses) has a seemingly convincing argument, but is shown to be a fool. The suspicion of sinful, non-procreational sex (notice the falling leaves, which do not play a reproductive role in trees) turns out to be true.
This belief in smoke without fire feeds into the conservative tenets of anti-intellectualism, the tendency to assume guilt based on prejudice and fuels paranoid conspiracy theories. It is also a meta-dog whistle confirming that yes, those other dog whistles the comic uses are really what you think and not just coincidental.
https://pbfcomics.com/comics/shocked/ clearly pandering to incels
https://pbfcomics.com/comics/puppy-wish/ clearly pandering to conservative fundamentalist christians
https://pbfcomics.com/comics/youll-be-ok/ clearly pandering to hypochondriacs
https://pbfcomics.com/comics/preserves/ incels again (and this one isn’t even remotely funny, the greatest crime)
I’m starting to think this artist is a cryptofascist. Basically equivalent to rock throw
Who does this one pander to?
Asking for a friend
It is a message that there is no smoke without fire. The “intellectual” (note the glasses) has a seemingly convincing argument, but is shown to be a fool. The suspicion of sinful, non-procreational sex (notice the falling leaves, which do not play a reproductive role in trees) turns out to be true.
This belief in smoke without fire feeds into the conservative tenets of anti-intellectualism, the tendency to assume guilt based on prejudice and fuels paranoid conspiracy theories. It is also a meta-dog whistle confirming that yes, those other dog whistles the comic uses are really what you think and not just coincidental.