• calliope@retrolemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      This has absolutely blown my mind!

      This looks exactly like the kind of whose ancestors would, over millions of years, eventually mutate to become a tree.

      The polished fossil in the Wikipedia article looks a shocking amount like wood!

      • Naz@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Dude; I think you’re absolutely correct.

        It looks like a proto-tree

        Also: Trees aren’t a uniform genus, but this goes to show, on any planet that has photosynthesis, trees will eventually evolve spontaneously

    • Phoenix3875@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      One of the linked papers thinks it’s actually horizontal rather vertical, as people have guessed originally.

    • doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      However since it doesn’t do photosynthesis we can rule out belonging to those clades,

      There are plants and algae that don’t do photosynthesis (although I think they still have vestigial chloroplast?)

  • someguy3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    But new research from the University of Edinburgh and National Museums Scotland has shown the fossil is neither fungus nor plant, but a new lifeform that became extinct around 370 million years ago.

    Sandy Hetherington, the lead co-author and research associate at National Museums Scotland, said: “They are life, but not as we now know it, displaying anatomical and chemical characteristics distinct from fungal or plant life, and therefore belonging to an entirely extinct evolutionary branch of life.”