ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net to Selfhosted@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agoAddiction....shredderfood.netimagemessage-square71linkfedilinkarrow-up1131arrow-down16file-text
arrow-up1125arrow-down1imageAddiction....shredderfood.netShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net to Selfhosted@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square71linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareSprocketfree@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 months agoNoob, just use sudo, less chars!
minus-squareShredderFeeder@shredderfood.netOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·3 months agoOddly enough, still generates errors. (There are stuff in user directories that are set to 600… so even root can’t browse/open.)
minus-squarevillage604@adultswim.fanlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 months agoThere’s also some stuff in Proc and run that won’t let you.
minus-squareTechnopagan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 months agoAre you sure? Root can see everything.
minus-squareHule@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 months agoOn a network, it can’t. NFS mount probably.
minus-squareSprocketfree@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoWell now I have to try this. Missing that executable bit would make sense. But last time I did this on / I didn’t get errors 🤔
Noob, just use sudo, less chars!
Oddly enough, still generates errors. (There are stuff in user directories that are set to 600… so even root can’t browse/open.)
There’s also some stuff in Proc and run that won’t let you.
Are you sure? Root can see everything.
On a network, it can’t.
NFS mount probably.
Well now I have to try this. Missing that executable bit would make sense. But last time I did this on / I didn’t get errors 🤔