- cross-posted to:
- linux@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- linux@lemmy.world
Cited from the article:
[…] the Void Linux project does have a contributing policy over AI usage that reads:
"In this section, “AI” refers to generative artificial intelligence tools, including Large Language Models and similar technologies.
All contributions are expected to be made by humans. AI tools may be used for research and learning, but all content in contributions must originate from and be understood by the contributor. This includes code, documentation, issues, security reports, pull request descriptions, and comments in all Void Linux community spaces.
ALL usage of AI tools MUST be disclosed.
Do not bring AI review tools into pull requests.
Usage of AI-powered human-language translation tools is acceptable to facilitate contributions across language barriers."
To say that, you would need proof that this was in bad faith, wouldn’t you? I wrote this comment about polarization for a reason.
i need proof of the already proben impact of AI and AI datacenters over territories in the country i live in? x3
“oh no, i am a maintainer of +100 packages and somehow i did not check any of the proofs about AI impact in the world”
No, proof about the maintainers intentions. Because you make a statement about them.
I totally agree that there are very strong reasons to avoid LLM use (“AI”). Also fed up with the ham-fisted manners it is shoved in every place by companies, like github copilot. Also, all the BS in advertising it, with dishonest arguments. And I am extremely worried about the implications of “AI” as well.
But: you do not win this discussion by name-calling. Are you aware that the Linux community is also a target of trolling? Have you perhaps heard that polarizing topics (for example right now, gas prices, or migration) are absolutely used in a kind of information warfare to break communities and civil society? This topic is one of them.