• Cypher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 days ago

    The suggestion was that OP could simply make an atticle and reference works that make a strong case for that claim.

    It doesn’t appear to be difficult especially in relation to colonialism.

    Now if Wikipedia rejected a well researched, fairly written and referenced article, this would be a different discussion.

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      the claim is that wikipedia is biased against communism and dedicates a 1/4 of its existence to clearly displaying it:

      communism

      none of yours do

    • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      Now if Wikipedia rejected a well researched, fairly written and referenced article, this would be a different discussion.

      No it wouldn’t, it would be exactly the same because you would ignore that Wikipedia deleted it. And we know this because that is exactly what happened