Then again, I’m giving a much closer look at Haiku & BSD again since a slop generator was used in the Linux kernel.
As far as I understand, the Linux kernel uses LLMs in practice for code review, not for code generation. And they do not replace human review with it, but use it in addition.
It doesn’t matter. It was allowed at all. Linux is now as complicit with the slopiverse as X, Meta, Alphabet, Nvidia, and the rest of the bastards.
There are just two stances on this, and Linux has picked one. Either you’re in or you’re out. There are no more gray areas when the harm is proven and the damage is actively being done. There’s the moral choice where you denounce the evil, and there’s being evil.
As far as I understand, the Linux kernel uses LLMs in practice for code review, not for code generation. And they do not replace human review with it, but use it in addition.
Seeking to understand: this type of code review LLM usage is disallowed in the Void project, correct?
You cannot make code reviews or security audits which originated from an LLM?
The rules are cited above. As I read it, you can make code reviews using LLMs.
But:
It doesn’t matter. It was allowed at all. Linux is now as complicit with the slopiverse as X, Meta, Alphabet, Nvidia, and the rest of the bastards.
There are just two stances on this, and Linux has picked one. Either you’re in or you’re out. There are no more gray areas when the harm is proven and the damage is actively being done. There’s the moral choice where you denounce the evil, and there’s being evil.