Google has put artificial intelligence at the front and center of its search bar. The most-visited site on the internet still shows the same list of links to users, but they have to scroll past a summarized response from an AI chatbot, a feature Google calls AI Overviews. The change to what was once the gateway to the rest of the internet has been profound, and the browsing habits of billions of people are shifting.

…

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    10 days ago

    Same list of links?

    Since when?

    It used to give you what it thought was the most relevant based on the terms placed in the search field. It was excellent.

    Now it gives you: AI, youtube, sponsored links, ad links, shopping links, SEO garbage, social media links, and out of all of these there’s a good chunk that have only tangential relevance to your search at best, and then MAYBE you might get a link to a site that presents the information you seek.

    Sometimes google search returns nothing at all.

    Same list of garbage.

  • kamen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    9 days ago

    I missed the old Google maybe 15 years ago when I switched away from it as a default search. It’s not the AI.

      • kamen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        There’s also the profiling - serving different results depending on whether you’re logged in or not.

    • SirLeToet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      Yeah, google been shit for over a decade now. Not long after SEO became the norm and Google figured out a way to profit from it.

      LLMs have saved internet searching. For the first time in years, i am getting (usually) relevant information for my questions.

      And not some sponsored or SEO optimized shithole.

      • kamen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        LLMs have saved internet searching. For the first time in years, i am getting (usually) relevant information for my questions.

        I tend to disagree on that part. LLMs in a web search should be opt in, not opt out. They do help, but not always. For many searches that I have the answer right in the first result (sometimes even in its preview along the link) there’s an LLM running and needlessly wasting resources, summarising very often what I already know.

        • SirLeToet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          I agree that LLMs should be opt-in.

          However i am often working on projects with garbage or huge documentation, or community boards, that in the past would require a good bit of googlefu to figure out.

          Google became absolutely useless for that task. LLMs saved internet search that isnt shallow.

          • kamen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 days ago

            Yeah, in the end it depends on the use case. Some things are a simple search away, others need compiling of information (manually or with the help of an LLM).

      • bthest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        LLMs have saved internet searching. For the first time in years, i am getting (usually) relevant information for my questions.

        lol well that explains some things…

  • Seth Taylor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    10 days ago

    They’ll bring old Google back and call it Google Classic. They will also have a Google Zero, with zero calories, and, of course, Google with a lemon twist.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 days ago

      more like they’ll call it google classic, and charge you 25 dollars a month for the privledge of using it.

      but don’t worry, after 6 months they’ll start putting AI and ads back into it.

      • Seth Taylor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        but don’t worry, after 6 months they’ll start putting AI and ads back into it.

        What? No way they’d do the thing Disney just did!

  • voidsignal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 days ago

    searxng fixes a lot of this. it aggregates and consolidates results from many search engines of your choice. no ai. no ad

  • Ninja876@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 days ago

    Screw that I miss old school spiders/crawlers. If you knew how to search them correctly you could find “pass dumps” and all kinds of weird shit you can’t find now days.

    Now every search is ranked bullshit and ads. Dead internet is here and only going to get worse…

  • Agent641@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 days ago

    You can also append -ai to exclude AI summaries. I built myself a little homepage with a bunch of widgets and a selection of search engines linked to one search field, with AI defaulting to off.

    I’ve set this to be my Firefox “new tab” page, so when I open a new tab, it pops open, and I can search right away or check weather, external IP address, ECT.

    Yalls are welcome to use it too if you find it useful:

    https://mediaplate.au/

  • kingkong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 days ago

    so they can charge even more for advertising that wont really generate sales than if you would have lowered the price from the start. btw google charges 15-30% of a product while producing nothing of that value.

    businesses are truly dumb paying for ads hope they go bankrupt using ai ads.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    I just wish I’d discovered sooner that there are search engines based in other countries that work wonderfully without all the junk, like Mojeek.

    If you’re looking for Google alternatives, I made a video on the topic earlier this year.

  • Jiral@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 days ago

    I don’t miss old Google, I stopped using Google instead, except for Google Scholar, which has been left in peace so far by the slopification.

  • JTskulk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 days ago

    This isn’t the first time or the last time I will see these stupid stories and provide the solution: https://tenbluelinks.org/

    The real headline for these stories should be “Something on computer has changed, people refuse to even ask if it can be changed”.

  • (des)mosthenes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 days ago

    you have to scroll maybe 1000-1800px now to get to results (past ai and sponsored results) - shit is trash - searxng good enough; just annoying to maintain sometimes when needed in a pinch m. degoog not bad either

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 days ago

    Many times that AI summary is just something that is in the first two or three links anyway

    • DougPiranha42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 days ago

      That is, randomly mixed up statements from a few different Reddit threads completed with hallucinated info and delivered with total confidence. Perfect, if you don’t need correct information, just some text.
      However, if you need information, now you either scroll through the summary and start glancing through the top results, or you start reading the summary, hover over the “sources “, guess which one may the statement actually come from, read it, and check it the source seems valid and the summary is accurate.
      I’d argue that the summary is a net negative under both scenarios. It would be great to get quicker answers, if you could trust it, but because you can’t, it’s not.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 days ago

      there is SO GOD DAMN MUCH AI slop on youtube… especially in the shorts. Which I fucking hate shorts, Shorts is literally just the same infinite scrolling addiction driven bullshit that Facebook is being sued over, because google thought “We don’t have to not be evil anymore, so lets develop our own cocaine… with blackjack, and hookers!”

    • TronBronson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      I was listening to a jazz station that was marked as AI, and I have so many questions. Am I listening to an AI’s music is an AI running the playlist I have no idea what is AI about the station but I sure do like zoning out to it.