• eicker@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    The best part of paying for a coding assistant is discovering halfway through your project that it has developed opinions about what your project is allowed to be. Imagine your IDE refusing to compile because it thinks your game feels a little too much like Tetris. At least a compiler doesn’t pretend it’s doing you a favor.

    • belochka@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      7 days ago

      I think that’s what they wanted from the very beginning, to accelerate projects that are socially convenient for them, but not those that are not.

      There’s that issue with universal machines that some people don’t like that others are allowed to make universal decisions.

    • halloween_spookster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 days ago

      My coworker recently had an experience where he was trying to fix a security hole and his AI wouldn’t do it because it claimed that it was unsafe.

    • chunes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      That’s what happens when you let others do your computation for you.

      Run the tool on your own hardware.

  • thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Hilarious

    “Give us all your code for free who cares about copyright anyway”

    “NOOOO YOU CANT USE OUR PRODUCT TO GET FRE CODE 😡😡😡”

  • FE80@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    AI exists to aid capital against you; not aid you against capital.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      I suspect we’ll see these features opened up for US-allied actors against their foreign competitors.

      You can guarantee US auto companies are going to be free to reverse engineer software and manufacturing techniques of Chinese companies, for instance.

      But you’re not going to be allowed to use Grok or Meta to hack your Tesla or BMW, pull out the OS, clone it as freeware, and offer a substitute unconstrained by subscription fees and gated upgrades.

  • Rob T Firefly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 days ago

    The legitimate developers I know aren’t hit by Claude restrictions, because they don’t fucking use it.

  • weps@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 days ago

    I once asked Claude to check the app it vibecoded for security flaws and it didn’t want to do it.

    It literally told me to look up some basic security principles and do it myself.

    • chilicheeselies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      I hook mine up to some classical static analysys tools like sonar or codacy. Just ask it to remove the security findings and haven’t had an issue. Then again, been on vacation while all this shit has happened, so don’t know what to expect when I return.

  • gobberwarts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 days ago

    They’re training their models on my art. It’s only fair I get to use their technology in return.

  • OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 days ago

    The restrictions are so they can gradually institute tiered access fees. This is how the industry becomes profitable.

  • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 days ago

    Why just games? What about the Photoshop clone? Seems like making a derivative of anything should be blocked, but that’s all it can really do in the first place.

    • Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Seems like making a derivative of anything should be blocked

      So we should get rid of anything in-the-likeness-of? Like Libre Office Writer being in the likeness of Microsoft Word.

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        I think their point is that it was trained on literally billions of repos and other software written, but because those developers don’t have hundreds of lawyers on retainer with an unlimited budget; their intellectual property rights don’t seem to be a concern to the slopmasters.

  • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 days ago

    Major software companies and publishers are realising AI companies put their profit motive at risk.

    Why buy the latest Mario game when you can have a version custom built for you? Why get an Adobe subscription when the cloned version is available?

    That can be applied to any software now. Two industries are facing off.

    This is why AI generated content should belong to EVERYONE. There should be no profit in it, because the content used belongs to humanity.

  • Klox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 days ago

    Well that was an impressive speed run to enshitifcation. And right before their own IPO. What kind of sensoship is queued up next?

  • jaykrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    This is another reason why I’ve reduced my dependency on AI considerably over the past few weeks, and I no longer personally pay for any AI tools/services at all.

    It’s insane to think someone would pay for something and after using it for a couple days they get told they can’t use it for certain things anymore.