It’s not one wug, two wugayn, three awaag?
- 0 Posts
- 7 Comments
Krita has been working on the text tool in recent years, so it might be better than you remember it.
Shihali@sh.itjust.worksto
Linguistics Humor@sh.itjust.works•The English features I hate so much that I actually learned their true names.English
3·1 year agoOn thinking it over, “proper” spelling of foreign words has done its own share of damage to English spelling. We don’t just have to learn our own spelling conventions, we also have to learn foreign ones. Or not (sent to you from Cairo, Illinois, locally pronounced “care-oh”)
Shihali@sh.itjust.worksto
Linguistics Humor@sh.itjust.works•The English features I hate so much that I actually learned their true names.English
3·1 year agoIt’ll be part of the great English spelling reform. Until then, it’s going to be spelled the way we Romanized Greek in the 16th century.
Shihali@sh.itjust.worksto
Linguistics Humor@sh.itjust.works•The English features I hate so much that I actually learned their true names.English
5·1 year agoYou’re about twenty centuries too late on the χ thing. You’re gonna need to go back and talk to the Romans.
Shihali@sh.itjust.worksto
Linguistics Humor@sh.itjust.works•This is a labubu. Now there is another one. There are two _______.English
1·1 year agoIt’s because -us is the Latin second declension nominative singular, and its nominative plural is -i. People educated enough to know the -us/-i pattern (cactus/cacti, alumnus/alumni, stimulus/stimuli) but unaware that “octopus” is Greek and has an irregular stem are likely to misapply the Latin pattern.

B bel looks like Sanskrit bala “strong”.
H1 h1engw looks like Sanskrit agni or Latin ignis, but why n-gw instead of g-n?