I don’t have or like cats but what you’re saying seems like a very different conversation and I’m not interested in it.

Yes exactly! And exactly!

It’s people like her who make life worth living. People who solve hard problems that need solving (or sometimes don’t even need it) are the best people.

I have a feeling I would agree if I had a clue who this is. It’s unfortunate how many people out there who are a thing because people don’t treat them like the dogshit they are. Like Andrew Tate. Nevermind how is he not in prison, how does anyone like him? And then because people like him he gets attention as being the monster he is. And the cycle continues.

Oh so I guess if we cannot be perfect we should just stop caring. Blocking people who cannot be communicated with on here requires way too much effort and yet I persist…

Like what the fuck is the point in pretending people need to know that nothing is perfect? Everyone obviously already gets that

You’re implying something and it’s not good. Pretend otherwise all you want, I won’t see your messages

But it does prevent huge amounts of environmental damage which can be helped, while we cannot help that cats require food. The only thing we could do about that is farm chickens for them or something.

They expect it though

their food has a significant impact on the environment

What is anyone supposed to do with that information? Ie what is your point?

Anarchy is where everyone serves you? TIL

This censorship is pathetic

Yeah I’ll never understand the tendency for people to make memes with an expression that holds no decipherable meaning and also has a caption “such and such be like…”

Apparently he also works in a hardware store, and has this very “meaningful” look on his face if you ask a question

Disagree, more like the opposite. Now all my machines can be managed with portable scripts that handle common tasks. When I used windows I didn’t even bother scripting usually because it’s a shit show. And fuck powershell before anyone says “it’s totally not that bad despite the non standard… Practically everything”

That’s cool. What do you do when you, for example, go to pay your utility bills or plan a trip, and the sites required don’t work? I’m sorry to keep asking versions of this question, I’m just truly perplexed. When you stack this against even a choice like going vegan, veganism seems easy (and I feel like it’s quite difficult in today’s world).

I interact with websites very often that seem to be the only option to accomplish something I want or need to do. If most websites don’t work, that makes once-easy things hard again. So it is just hard for me to picture. Especially when framed like your post did. I know it’s a joke but surely to post it, and after your other comments, instead of seeing this as a huge obstacle, you seem to see it as a blessing?

The first string in quotes was you, the second was me. Probably was confusing. In any case you answered my question and I feel less confused. For me, this number would probably be 95% no kidding. 50-70% is surprising but again, before I thought you were implying most sites, maybe even 90% worked fine without JavaScript. Once I consider that you already know many sites that don’t work without JavaScript which you don’t even try anymore, I guess those percentages could make sense.

It’s a wild way to live, gotta say. By turning off JavaScript, you’re essentially turning off most of the Internet. And especially when you are already running it in a super secure container, this is just wild to me.

There are so many things I hate about these types of sites,

What confuses me is that in this case “these types of sites” is “almost the entire Internet”

I’ll be more direct and ask a question. What percentage of the Internet would you say you run into major functionality broken without JavaScript?

It’s just a very confusing thing to claim, that’s all. If 90%+ of the web doesn’t work with js off then you’re either predetermining that you just won’t use 90% of the web. You’ve decided that ahead of time, so you cannot really say “these sites suck” because you haven’t even been able to use them. If you had said “I try not to use JavaScript dependent sites” that makes sense. But the way you’re presenting it, you don’t have any trouble and just use most sites. Which I happen to know is not possible.

I tried using the web again last night with a browser extension that toggles off JavaScript. Out of like 8 websites I tried to use, literally all of them were broken.

So it’s not even just convenience. It’s that practically no one is building websites to work without JavaScript. I think that sucks, but I cannot change it by just avoiding most websites in defiance.

I don’t know what websites you’re using that still work without JavaScript, but they’re in the minority from what I can tell.

1000 upvotes, 400 comments all pretending to get it

That may be true also, but no one posted me with the caption “lmao”