• 0 Posts
  • 91 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 13th, 2023

help-circle




  • expect the ornstien rush at the start.

    you mission is to manage distance, your back should always be face at the angle firthest from both.

    now you have a choice to make, depending on what reward you want.

    A. the better over all reward requires you kill Smogh (large lad) first, which is trickier, because he is slow, and ornstien will be attempting to rush you down. you objective is to orbit Smogh, you MUST maintain facing with both. but do not attempt to try to get kite distance away from orstein, just use smoghs lard size to body block ornstein by a close orbit. dont mind ornstein if he is behind smogh so much, focus on smough. keep close to him so you can orbit with less work, but watch for his telegraphed attacks. you can punish him more consistently then you can ornstein because his attacks have slow wind up and recovery.

    B. If you just want this fight done, kill ornstein first. its easier. you can kite smough entierly when fighting ornstein, but just watch for his rushes as he likes to reach around ornstein. ornstein is very fast on recovery, so only hit him a coulle of times when the opportunity arises, do not over comit your stamina. if you are low on stamina focus on positioning both enemies and getting distance from smogh. ornstein has less hp so you get more work done for less.

    after the first is dead the other will switch up, but the fight is your standard boss deul. just testing your composure and remaining allowance for mistakes/healing.

    generaly, abusing the pillars in the duo phase can give you a moments breath, but its mostly a trap and may seperate the two. also you have been hording those resins, because you have the gamer disease. after the first fight or two when you manage to get one of them to less then half start useing them, and dont look back. THIS is THE fight. you will have better options in later fights.

    all else fails, summon. as much as elitests will argue, it more important you get hours in and see the game. it will get you to improve. and you will learn to love this fight. you can always return for your annualy mandatory playthrugh.

    praise the sun \[T]/





  • because our buying habits are shaped by necessity and availability. to argue that the individual needs to change would require agreement to the degree of millions of people all at once, who have the privilege of choice make a substantial change, and even then the systems in place would defend itself from this change. in a discussion about needing to hold corporations and systems accountable, you argue for the responsibility of the individual, a concept that uses the most effort for the smallest gain, if any.

    the concept of the free market is and has always been bull shit. the free market ideology requires the consumer to have: 1. maximal choice, 2. maximal and complete knowlege of every facet of a product (a. it’s ecological cost, b. it’s social cost, c. it’s manufacture, d. it’s transport, e. its storage, f. it’s operational harm ect. ) and every facet of every other option to compare. as well as truth in marketing which is antithetical to marketing itself.

    in a discussion about the need to hold the system accountable, attempting to narrow it to the individual is a distraction to progress




  • it’s not just about the removal of the human, or run away corporations, or the destruction of the planet, or the squandering of art, or social warfare

    it’s that ai is FUCKING DUMB.

    you spend more effort trying to catch their dumb before it gets out into the wild, and to top it off it has the whole ‘semi self driving car’ problem where the point is laziness, so obviously the focus to whip the ai in shape is constantly waneing until it fucks up bad. and then you get to blame the ai, which is the PERFECT SCAPE GOAT. on top of that it’s sycophantic, where truth in its outputs is not even in its top 10 motivating pressures. it’s got a memory that will lose older information at inconsistent rates depending on fluctuating token availability, and when it suddenly sees a gap in knowledge, it will out right LIE rather then admit a failing. it does not have a true comprehensive under standing of any topic, because the very nature of an LLM is probalistic connection of abstracted nodes representing data/text. the longer it must work on a single conversation the more polluted its weights gets! it can’t prioritize certain expectations because again, not a true comprehension of the discussion.

    and you want this to develop code! something that is understood to take deep planning and concentration, and interlocking systems?