Yliaster

Problem is conservatives also pump more kids out, especially the religious ones iirc.

Forgot the /s

These levels of corruption are frustrating; money shouldn’t decide the law.

No handouts to corporations, indeed. Make them pay.

I don’t get why companies get to legally bailout like this. Why do people have to suffer for their bullshit? Enslave the CEOs if you have to make things right, leave the people out of it.

Wouldn’t that still eventually allow for an era(s) of monetizing token usage for universal applications? Even if it gets better over time and continuously replaces itself over decades

I wonder if it’s just a matter of time though.

Remember how computers used to be as big as a room and even then only stored 2mbs back when they were new? But then became more portable and accessible? It makes me wonder if, in a few decades, it’d be possible that happens with data centers in the future.

Can someone explain the two claims made in the title, in summary?

Huggingface isn’t really user-friendly for the non-tech guy. It’d be nice if you could just download them and import them into something that has a user friendly UI

The title is clickbait. The article does not mention the name of any free, private AI models.

It mentions heretic as a tool of abliteration (removes guardrails).

The rest of the article is just waffling about security concerns nobody cares about (at least, not those coming for the title anyway).

Think microslop doesn’t track you? Think again.

Switching from Google to MS/Bing isnt really much of a privacy win.

DDG isn’t the holy grail people make it out to be; it has contracts with Microsoft and we all know how Microslop likes AI.

That’s disappointing. But Mojeek is kind of unusable tbh.

Startpage and Mojeek.

DDG has contracts w Microslop.

Not sure what the most likely, favourable outcome is supposed to look like atp.

Hmm. Doesn’t seem like it’ll be good news for the average person afterwards then. But perhaps when the bomb goes off computer (ram) prices can go down(?).

I don’t really get what the punchline is. It’s not sustainable seems to be it, but it doesn’t seem likely to be destroying OpenAI or Anthropic etc, which is what I want to happen.

The guy you mentioned is an editor for BBC news, which is kinda disappointing (US news outlets are owned by the same company)

It’s a lot of people but big tech can easily get back those numbers.

Let’s see how the tendency unrolls over the long-term.

That’s just capitalism. But yeah, they can just bailout since the concept of separate legal entities means that individual investors aren’t held responsible for corporate losses.