

I read them and there were some interesting parts scattered amidst poor journalism and FUD
Is your position basically just ACAB?


I read them and there were some interesting parts scattered amidst poor journalism and FUD
Is your position basically just ACAB?


What kind of ways, can you explain?


Ex pal people are on slack, not discord. This is probably an investor server


No that is not how reasoned debate works, you have to articulate your argument lest you’re just sloppily babbling talking points


Basically no. What you’re calling tailored AI is actually low cost AI. You’ll be hard pressed, on the other hand, to get ChatGPT o3 to hallucinate at all


What exactly is the argument?


Have you read the post?
If you’d like to refute the content on the grounds of another scientist, can you please provide a reference? I will read it


I don’t think this answers the question


Thank you for your considered and articulate comment
What do you think about the significant difference in attitude between comments here and in (quite serious) programming communities like https://lobste.rs/s/bxixuu/cheat_sheet_for_why_using_chatgpt_is_not
Are we in different echo chambers? Is chatgpt a uniquely powerful tool for programmers? Is social media a fundamentally Luddite mechanism?
Some random goon you met in a 5 person discord isn’t “astroturfing”