da winors wrait da histoorie buks. I am weri smort.

Of course “we need to crop out the watermark” isn’t the only shite take you have.

OP, do you have some kind of humiliation fetish or why is your take this shit?

Do you think that a painter’s signature on a painting is an ad? If I listen to music and the artist states their name, is that an ad? All of these are just a way of saying “I made this”. They aren’t ads in any meaningful sense of the word.

Sure, if you gloss over the “most” part and replace it with “all”.

No LLM fucks children like CEOs do.

My driving inspector flat out told me that if I were his son, he’d beat me.

Hated driving so much afterwards, that I didn’t drive for half a year after getting my license.

Chugged some goals, nailed some Joes.

Cool 👍

I don’t mind the dance, it’s just easier to cook them when they’re snapped.

Other pasta shapes rule btw

Got converted to the church of snapping spaghetti by persians doing it and telling me that they give a donkey’s cock about what Italians think

English teachers and their consequences were disastrous for the linguistic education of the human race.

“anyways isn’t a word” mfer, if a large portion of English speakers use it, it is a word.

Brother* in Vishnu, this is AI.

I mean, so are the gpus. At best, the most human input was the Christmas hat and the text on the gpus.

And even the text looks weird.

That image of Altman is AI-generated.

Du hast vollkommen Recht :)

My source is that I made it the fuck up

Yes. Just one with a good and understandable motive.

Correction: Britain halfheartedly tried to mitigate the famine that was caused by their wartime policies, their land grabbing practices and wage practices. Bengal exported food to Sri Lanka in the initial months of the famine, the same playbook as with the Irish famine. When Britain finally delivered aid, they tried to make it some market scheme, with loans, rice injections into the market and rice payment for hard labor. Harebrained. The Brits prioritized the war in the region over effective famine relief. That’s what Churchill did wrong.

Regarding Mao: The intent of most of his policies was to improve harvests. Of course, if you persecute your intellectuals, use the teachings of an absolute fucking moron as the basis of your policies and brand every failure to deliver as the work of evil rightists and saboteurs, you’re going to kill a shit ton of people. Maybe a skilled war lord, he was utterly incompetent when it came to managing this famine. And so was the entire state apparatus.