This isn’t someone drawing CP though. It’s AI-generated CP, which means the model had to be actually trained on CP. You might argue that there are already models trained on CP, and the chicken is already in the nugget, but legalising it creates financial incentive to train on CP because then you can sell your model to paedophiles.
Ubuntu was my first Linux distro and I liked it back then. I would’ve recommended the old Ubuntu to non-tech-savvy people, or people who want a Linux that “just works” (although back then no Linux “just worked”, there was always at least a bit of debugging for me). However it’s enshittified a lot. A lot of basic software is only available as snaps. It generally feels quite corporate these days.
Seconding Niri, but also I’ve seen swayfx setups that have Hyprland-like aesthetics.
If you don’t care about fancy effects, I’ve been a river user for years and I like it. Nowadays it is just a compositor and the WM is separate, but river-classic (which includes a WM) has a dwm-like tag system, is programmatically configured (ie you speak to the river IPC in any language of your choosing—by default it’s a shell script but the WM just executes ~/.config/river/init on startup, so that file can be any executable), and is simple and lightweight. The new 0.4.x release separates the compositor and WM, so you can pick or write your own WM that suits your own workflow/use-case, if that’s your thing—it might not be if you don’t want customisability and you just want something that makes the decisions for you to a good enough standard.
Bite each other’s dicks off
Yes, I said “no they don’t” because translation has the ethical implications of global inequality. Which, btw, climate change greatly exacerbates. I never said that LLMs don’t have environmental impacts if used for translation; I said they have additional ethical implications when used for machine translation. Which is true. I have my doubts that you are particularly concerned with tech ethics and global inequality given how flippant you have been about the real issue of exclusion of global majority populations just from things as simple as language choices.
A small fraction? I’m talking about the majority of people on Earth who are disadvantaged by English centrism.
And where did I say “it’s ok to burn the world”? I never specified any position on technology, but to be clear, I am a luddite, I don’t think modern tech is ecologically justifiable, and is built upon a foundation of slavery and ecological destruction. It is a separate question of a policy of a small software forge (which already runs on ecologically destructive hardware; the vast majority of emissions for modern tech come from the manufacture of the devices we’re using to talk now, from your own client device to the devices being used as servers to relay our messages) to allow or disallow AI translations. I do not think that our energy use is justifiable. Now LLMs use a comparable amount of energy to, say, AAA video games. I think this is a bad thing and video games should be more computationally efficient. Does that mean I support banning people from playing AAA video games? No, I don’t think that’s the way to address this problem. Questions of policy are separate questions to questions of technology; a technology can be bad without the solution being to ban it, because the effects of a ban are different to just getting rid of the banned technology.
And LLM translations have all the same political and ethical as coding
No, they don’t. As I said, machine translations make contributions more accessible to ESOL speakers (ie global majority populations) and can help reduce Eurocentrism. The reason why I said I think an exception should be made is specifically for ethical and political reasons.
If you want to skip to the changes.
I think this is a really solid LLM policy for a platform like SourceHut. Since they rely on a policy that’s deliberately open to interpretation to allow for reasonable discretion, and rely upon the honour system for enforcement/adherence, I don’t think we should necessarily be telling larger projects to adopt the same policy because this becomes untenable for big projects or platforms. But it’s still good to see policies in this spirit being adopted. The only change I’d like to see is explicitly allowing AI translation for non-code, like comments and emails. It reduces the barrier of entry for ESOL contributors. If there’s concern about the accuracy of translations, they can always include the original alongside the machine translation.
It’s FOSS has a tendency to write in that kind of cadence. In general the articles they put out don’t seem to be ones that are tedious or boring to write, so I don’t see why they’d AI-generate their articles. I also remember their old articles before the AI hype train being written in the same kind of cadence. It is grating but I think it’s an annoying human, not an annoying LLM.
It may well be intended as a serious attempt but personally I’m just going to view it as trolling/a gimmick, in which case I don’t care how shit the actual platform is. Seems to be more about making a point against Musk than getting a serious userbase.
I don’t know about Nazi specifically, but people often use Nazi to mean fascist in general. And he is definitely far-right. I would prefer that foss remain hostile to fascists.
It will still generate traffic to Twitter in order to fetch the tweet. It’s an alternative frontend for privacy purposes, so Twitter doesn’t get your browser fingerprint, IP address, etc. It’s all proxied through xcancel/nitter.
Julia Evans has a bunch of these really handy cheatsheets. I have several saved that I reference semi-regularly.
100k/12≈8k, including taxes, after taxes idk depends where you live. My rent is the majority of my income, and I make much less than that, so the absolute amount of money I have after paying for things like rent and utilities, to spend on food, is much less too, even if we assume the same % of income going to rent. Again I’m not saying things aren’t more expensive in the US, but it is still a lot of money. You aren’t going to be struggling financially. My friends in the US make much less than that. Maybe you’d be less well-off than peers who do the same job, but I hope you realise that for a lot of people elsewhere in the world, that’d be 3 salaries already.
Yeah I was gonna say. I didn’t understand what people were complaining about, that’s loads of money to me. I know stuff’s more expensive in the US but it’s not that much more expensive that 100k isn’t an insane amount of money to live off.
Wtf so you mean Alpine will not work on real hardware on desktop? I run Alpine on real hardware for a desktop. The only issue you’ll run into is video games not playing nicely with musl, but there’s compatibility layers you can use for that.
Void works fine with Wayland. It isn’t security-focused. Same goes for Artix.
OpenBSD is security-focused, but has limited Wayland support. Sway works on it, but there isn’t much Wayland software, and it’s missing some crucial things like xdg-desktop-portal.
Yes, I’m not an IT professional and don’t have education in anything related to computers. Has always been a hobby for me. I don’t want to do my hobbies for work because I fear it would take the fun out.
That’s fair. Which models did you have? I had a couple problems with the earlier Google Pixels, but I’ve found the later ones have really ironed out their hardware problems.
I think your main problem is going to be finding phones for cheap that also work well as Linux phones. I think the lowest-effort options like Pine phones are gonna cost you more. But I wish you luck.
yovday
Looks nice though, and it’s cool how well Linux works for touchscreens these days.