The man with the black hat threatened to cut the beard
- 1 Post
- 47 Comments
cron@feddit.orgto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•aliasvault/aliasvault: Privacy-first password manager with built-in email aliasing. Fully encrypted and self-hostable.English
1·4 months agoEven then, there are lots of edge cases with e-mail that are easy to get wrong and might become security risks.
I‘m not saying this applies to this project, this is more of a general concern.
The latest open weights model from google might be a good fit for you. The 26B model works pretty well on my machine, though the performance isn’t great (6 tokens per second, CPU only).
cron@feddit.orgto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Vigil - a self-hosted dashboard that watches your Docker imagesEnglish
1·5 months agoDoes it offer notifications?
3 of your docker containers have new versions available
With portainer business, you could easily build an update procedure yourself. Just create webhooks for the stacks you want to update and run a daily curl script that triggers these hooks.
cron@feddit.orgto
Technology@lemmy.world•Donut Labs released VTT's independant test results!English
3·6 months agoI think the “it retains 98% charge” quote might be misleading. Thats true for the capacity (in Ah), but not for the energy (in Wh). The report shows this clearly in the tables:

Efficiency is about 83% if my math is right (which is still good).
cron@feddit.orgto
Technology@lemmy.world•Donut Labs released VTT's independant test results!English
6·6 months agoThe report is from an independant institute from Finland, not Poland:
VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd
Similar approach here:
- Lexmark scanner witg ADF
- Scan to FTP (SftpGO)
- Paperless has the FTP folder as ingest
It doesn’t take more than 10 seconds to scan a doc this way.
They require an “data center” subscription now, and they will end support for that in 2029. So self hosting jira is basically not an option anymore.
Nice that you added “status=progress” so I can closely follow what is happening.
cron@feddit.orgto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•BentoPDF is a self hostable, privacy first PDF ToolkitEnglish
3·8 months agoIs there a function to create a booklet or brochure?
This was a very useful feature to print a number of pages and have them in an easy format to read.
However, at least my Ubuntu print driver doesn’t have this feature, and I would need an extra tool to achive this goal.
Phew, it’s only the motherboard that broke, not the RAM.
I heard he already lost interest in this project.
cron@feddit.orgto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Do you rebuild your container images yourself?English
6·9 months agoI did it only once (yet) because i needed a specific addon for the software.
In my case, I wanted to use caddy webserver with a specific plugin. It was quite easy to create a new image exactly the way i wanted it.
cron@feddit.orgto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Decreasing Certificate Lifetimes to 45 DaysEnglish
2·9 months agoThe maintainers of the big web browsers have pretty strict rules for CAs in this list. If any one of them gets caught issuing only one certificate maliciously, they are out of business.
And all CAs are required to publish each certificate in multiple public, cryptographically signed ledgers.
Sure, there is a history of CAs issuing certificates to people that shouldn’t have them (e.g. for espionage), but that is almost impossible now.
cron@feddit.orgto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Decreasing Certificate Lifetimes to 45 DaysEnglish
5·9 months agoFor 3 more months or so, you can’t buy them in april 2026 anymore
cron@feddit.orgto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Decreasing Certificate Lifetimes to 45 DaysEnglish
353·9 months agoShort lifespans are also great when domains change their owner. With a 3 year lifespan, the old owner could possibly still read traffic for a few more years.
When the lifespan ist just 30-90 days, that risk is significatly reduced.
cron@feddit.orgto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Decreasing Certificate Lifetimes to 45 DaysEnglish
42·9 months agoNo, these are completely separate issues.
- CRL: protect against certificates that have their private key compromised
- CT: protect against incompetent or malicious Certificate Authorities.
This is just one example why we have certificate transparency. Revocation wouldn’t be useful if it isn’t even known which certificates need revocation.
The National Informatics Centre (NIC) of India, a subordinate CA of the Indian Controller of Certifying Authorities (India CCA), issues rogue certificates for Google and Yahoo domains. NIC claims that their issuance process was compromised and that only four certificates were misissued. However, Google is aware of misissued certificates not reported by NIC, so it can only be assumed that the scope of the breach is unknown.



Such bugs have already appeared in the past. It’s only logical that this happens from time to time, as the creators of bitwarden don’t test the compatobility with 3rd party servers.
What is important is that they’re not deliberately blocking vaultwarden.