fonix232

You know wrong.

Even in the early days (97-01), they’ve used venture funding (approx $80mil) for the DVD mailing business.

And the reason they didn’t really go the VC funding way later is because they had an IPO in 2002, which meant instead of relying on VC funds, they took on massive amounts of debt to allow the takeoff of streaming.

VOD was a thing before streaming tho

No, that’s the evolution of venture capitalism.

Step 1: groundbreaking service comes in that fills a market hole

Step 2: people flock to service

Step 3: service gets VC funding to continue operations, subsidising the users

Step 4: service gets “copied”, competitors crop up, use VC funding to eke out their own marketshare while making things worse for everyone but themselves

Step 5: expansion plateaus as interest in service generalises (basically, everyone who could be interested, is already using it)

Step 6: VC funding depletes, company has to start making a profit - leading to price hikes, which is followed by other players in the market as that’s how capitalism works

Step 7: price hikes not being enough, service tries to capitalise on their userbase (think restricting features to a higher paid tier, introducing new tiers that strip away features, introducing ads, etc.)

Step 8: market is saturated with plateaud services, user movement is minimal, and everybody hates it because it’s expensive, and reintroduced the same problem the initial innovative service meant to fix.

Yep, that position is either kept open for a specific candidate (probably already working at the company), or it’s only there for legal requirements…

If you want a NAS specific case, check on AliExpress - a bunch of $200-300 options with SATA backplanes, EATX support, and your typical 8-16 front-loaded disk bay with disk caddies.

Thrussy? Put in.

$10 says it’s a “repurposed” sex hot and it would’ve taken a whopping week for a more techy student to hack it and say profanities or something similar…

Bro she got that dawg in her

I think this topic is actually ripe for debate.

On one hand we know that Majel specifically recorded phonemes so her voice can be used for Star Trek purposes after her passing. While not a direct consent of “do whatever you want with my voice”, the intent of similar purposes as OP’s has been clearly present.

There’s also Paramount’s refusal to use her voice in new Trek, aside from a few snippets here and there (mostly Picard for the throwback value). Which kinda goes against the spirit of Trek.

On the other hand, the entire area of voice cloning is gray as fuck. It can very easily be used for nefarious purposes, yes - let that be corporate greed or fraud or propaganda. But if I make my own voice system, do I really hurt anyone by using their voice? I am not profiting off of it, I am not sharing the end result, it lives on my computer and that’s it.

But, let’s say I want to do the same. There’s this TV show from some 20 years ago called Eureka. In it is one of the earliest representations of a smart house with an AI governor, called SARAH. SARAH is voiced by one of the recurring cast members, in fact it’s an ongoing joke that the house is voiced by this guy “talking like a girl”, and that he’s trying to get Sarah Michelle Gellar to do the proper, final voice…

Now, the voice itself is pretty unique, but it isn’t the voice of the actor, it’s been heavily digitally edited. It’s also a pretty unique voice but not something 99.9% of people would recognise. I make my clone from my own BR disk collection, with a set of automated and AI tools to get the right audio, clean it up, split by talker, and process all 77 episodes, manually selecting the right samples, manually tagging and labelling each; and finally, fine-tuning my own model for my own use. It will never leave my home, I won’t sell or share it, and technically, with me owning the BR collection, this would fall under fair use.

Which is still quite different than, say, a corporate entity trying to sell more product by using your voice.

I think this topic is actually ripe for debate.

On one hand we know that Majel specifically recorded phonemes so her voice can be used for Star Trek purposes after her passing. While not a direct consent of “do whatever you want with my voice”, the intent of similar purposes as OP’s has been clearly present.

There’s also Paramount’s refusal to use her voice in new Trek, aside from a few snippets here and there (mostly Picard for the throwback value). Which kinda goes against the spirit of Trek.

On the other hand, the entire area of voice cloning is gray as fuck. It can very easily be used for nefarious purposes, yes - let that be corporate greed or fraud or propaganda. But if I make my own voice system, do I really hurt anyone by using their voice? I am not profiting off of it, I am not sharing the end result, it lives on my computer and that’s it.

But, let’s say I want to do the same. There’s this TV show from some 20 years ago called Eureka. In it is one of the earliest representations of a smart house with an AI governor, called SARAH. SARAH is voiced by one of the recurring cast members, in fact it’s an ongoing joke that the house is voiced by this guy “talking like a girl”, and that he’s trying to get Sarah Michelle Gellar to do the proper, final voice…

Now, the voice itself is pretty unique, but it isn’t the voice of the actor, it’s been heavily digitally edited. It’s also a pretty unique voice but not something 99.9% of people would recognise. I make my clone from my own BR disk collection, with a set of automated and AI tools to get the right audio, clean it up, split by talker, and process all 77 episodes, manually selecting the right samples, manually tagging and labelling each; and finally, fine-tuning my own model for my own use. It will never leave my home, I won’t sell or share it, and technically, with me owning the BR collection, this would fall under fair use.

Which is still quite different than, say, a corporate entity trying to sell more product by using your voice.

Tomatoes are fruit tho. Peppers too, and thus so is paprika, technically.

“The best” depends on what you really need.

Authentik and Authelia are two of the top most quoted solutions, but they aim to be an “everything in one” package, with tons of features a simple homelab will rarely need. They’re aimed more at enterprise-like setups.

On the other end of the spectrum you have e.g. Pocket-ID, which only does OIDC by itself (you can hook up an LDAP server as user database though); but that tradeoff means it uses little to no CPU time, and, in my experience, around 130MB RAM. Given RAM is getting more expensive than gold, one needs to consider memory footprint, especially for older homelab setups. We can’t all be running 256GB nodes after all.

So instead of hunting the mythical “best” solution, decide what features you really need, grab a list of providers that cover those features, and compare them to see what fits your needs best.

Get two juniors, unlimited Claude credits, and you’ll have the problem solved in a month flat

/s

The recommendations so far are quite solid.

I’d also add that crowdsec with the right collections as a primary filter within your reverse proxy setup can be extremely useful, potentially even better than fail2ban, as CS delivers a literal “scan every packet and put them against these rules” approach - where the rules are crowd sourced, thus are more up to date than any manual blocklists, filter list etc. can be, and can spot even 0day intrusion approaches.

Uhm, no.

Only if the licence allows. I personally go for A/GPLv3 wherever I can because I don’t want corporations to just take and not contribute back. But that means I can’t just copy MIT/Apache software, need to do my own implementation from scratch. Which I prefer anyway.

why would I try a book REQUESTING system when I’m working on my own AIO solution?

I’m actually working on an all in one solution that sort of fills the roles of Readarr AND Calibre - without all the baggage of the latter.

Oh, and of course a KOReader library plugin that foregoes OPDS and works like the Kindle interface (“available books” synced from this backend, one tap downloads them, plus potentially adding series handling too in the future).

But right now it’s mostly manual downloads + CWA ingest + OPDS via KOReader.

Or an SSD, for storage too.

Those guns STILL REQUIRE KEY COMPONENTS THAT CANT BE 3D PRINTED. Just how many times and how many ways do I have to explain this until it gets through?

You can 3D print a shadow gun, sure, even on a $100 cheapo FDM printer. Thing is, it won’t fucking work because there’s neither barrel nor firing pin. Two of the, oh, most crucial elements to make a gun into an actual gun. Up until you add these two bits, that gun will do more damage if you chuck it at your target than if you fired it.

TECHNICALLY, you could get away with a firing pin setup made from some wiring and an actual nail, but it would be highly unreliable - misfire, not fire at all, and so on. And even if it did fire, without a barrel, you’d have a 30-40% chance of not hitting your target… at which point you’re more likely to kill your target by aiming some higher power pyrotechnics at them. Which are easier and cheaper to acquire.

My point is that a 3D printer isn’t necessary for making a gun, and that you can’t even make the parts that make something into a gun, using a (regular, commercial FDM) 3D printer.

it’s like trying to regulate printers because you can “3D print a car”, when in reality you can 3D print a few accessories and components but the entire engine has to be manufactured differently…