• 0 Posts
  • 6 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: March 10th, 2025

help-circle
  • Stupid question, but what happens to a rejected PR? Because features get built for a reason (there’s usually a Ticket/Story for the feature that the PR adds) so do those just get closed? Or does the person have to re-write the code entirely?

    I know in my team, the most I could do is tell the coworker to self-review while keeping the PR open until they change some stuff. I have never rejected a PR before because no matter how bad a PR is, it always is technically necessary for the feature.


  • Like, if I’m doing something for myself, that’s exactly the place where I wanna do something amazing,

    That’s always my intention with my personal projects too! But that always results in “Wow I just learned how to do this thing much better, let me refactor the whole project to do it perfectly everywhere” followed by my Adderall running out. So there’s just so many half-done refactors I either forget about or abandon because I get a new idea the next day, but that’s totally just a skill issue.

    You’re right though, the code I write at work is much worse, but my Company hosts their own GitLab instance so the code we write can’t even be used to poison Copilot :(


  • you literally have access to all the code in the world

    I’d like to believe that they were honorable enough to not secretly train on code without people’s permission. But realistically they totally did exactly that, but just made the AI Model this incompetent through some other engineering blunder.

    Also, random side thought - training only on public repos probably yields you way higher code quality as opposed to training on both public and private repos? I assume we all have some very messy private repos that we’re too embarrassed to publish because the code quality is absolute shit … right?