Dokuwiki user here. Your cons are true, but compared to the cons of other ones, they are all solvable. The concern with a plug-in being required to do something is silly. It’s open source and the plugin system is limitless. If it’s ugly, make a theme. I’ve never had a problem with article titles being mutilated, but then again, I treat the file name (e.g. the url of the page) separate from the root header as you’re supposed to.

Considering your comment about search being awful in another wiki, it’s pretty good in Dokuwiki.

Considering how much you care about plain text, you should probably discount the con about file names as I’m pretty sure that’s part of why Dokuwiki does what it does. It’s an actual text file sitting in a directory that matches the path.

For what it’s worth, I admire Obsidian. If it’s a personal project with no intent to share, that’s what I’d use. For business or public hosting, I’d use (and do use, at my company) Dokuwiki.

Another fun thing from this show is the magic system, which limits the caster’s ability based on what they can imagine. Programming feels exactly like that to me. I mean, a lot of human ability is limited by that, but most stuff is also limited by physical constraints long before imagination. With programming, we more often hit the limit of our imagination, or time feasibility, before any other constraint.

Working with non programmers, it’s always wild to field their unimaginative solutions, and refreshing when someone actually had a good idea.

Working with less experienced programmers, it’s fun to help them through problems. So often they hit a wall they can’t imagine walking through, take some concession and build around the wall. You can appreciate the work, and then show them the simple solution to walk through the wall. If they have talent, they grow quick.

Working with a much more experienced programmer, or in a domain you don’t have much experience with, helps keep you humble because there’s no way you’re going to learn everything.

Anyway, back to writing my spells.

Going to try to convert two 2-post racks into a 4-post rack today. Dreading the mess though.

I’m confused, toner = laser. Toner is the media, it’s fine powder, applied to the paper via the drum and flash fused via a laser. Inkjet, liquid ink is the media, sprayed through a nozzle while moving back and forth.

Unless something about inkjet has improved in the 15 years since I was more inclined to know everything about them, the “goes bad” is what anyone with a brain should be focusing on. The first time you use a cartridge to print, it has a shelf life. It gunks up, prompting cleaning cycles that use dozens of pages worth of ink. If you only print a few pages a month, there’s a good chance you’re getting <40 pages out of that $63 cartridge.

I have a Brother DCP-7065DN, paid $64 for it in Feb 2014 (obviously a very good deal), page counter reads 3626. We’re on toner #3 including the starter, first was replaced in 2019, second in July 2025. Toner was $55 each.

I hope there aren’t people seriously advocating for inkjet printers for black and white anything. The only thing they are good for is photos, and even then you are paying more per print for a worse photo vs local print or online order options. That holds true even if you get good deals and somehow actually use the entire cartridge set without waste, I did the math a few times over the years. The only use cases are printing shit you’re too embarrassed to risk printer shop seeing, or is illegal/copyright, or you just like giving money to these garbage companies.

Maybe projects like this will change the math. I think if they targeted commercial print specifications it would be quite interesting. The jump to larger format printers is so expensive.

Unbound on my OPNsense firewall. I don’t have advice for you, do you have some specific goals besides just having a DNS?