MaxMalRichtig

Arch comments in 3, 2, 1 …

CoMaps is an app that focuses on user friendliness. But it might lack some “power features”.

Osmand is great when you really want to tweak your map experience. But it can be a little complicated for the occasional user.

An somewhat complete overview off apps & tools that are using OSM data can be found here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Android_applications

If you can’t find a location/address with your OSM app, check if the data even exists on OSM. If it is not there yet, you can check out StreetComplete, which is a cool way to add, check & fix the upstream OSM data.

Have a nice day too! 👋

Read my second sentence again.

The thing I am SURE about is, that using words and concepts from one area and postulating that they are applying in the same sense in another area, just because we found some loose similarity or similar trait, is logically not sound. See False-Equivalence

Our understanding of “pain” only makes sense when applying it to beings with a nervous system, because this word describes just THAT.

It’s like talking about hair and hairstyles and then applying the derived insights to birds, because their feathers “remind” us of hair.

It just doesn’t apply. Other contexts require dedicated concepts that are not “loaded” by using termina from irrelevant concepts.

Emotive language does not help your argument. It weakens any validity it might have otherwise.

Plants don’t “feel pain”. The entire concept of “pain” is alien to everything without a central nervous system.

Plants DO however react to stressful external stimuli. They do that in a way, that we will never be able to relate to.

Some publications use words as “pain” and “suffering” in that context in order to go give non-academic folks something to relate. But on a scientific level, these terms are irrelevant at best.

Coworker in random conversation: “Here, have something vegan instead.”
* Pushes @Optional@piefed.social towards conversation partner. *

I give you this: https://loadingartist.com/comic/let-me-sin/

😘

I feel you. This can be so me. 😅

Not sure and not queer here.

But my guess is, that the woman in the cis pic has very trimmed, slim eyebrows - while the others have more natural looking brows. Maybe because the queer folk don’t need to play the “stereotypical female game”. They are defining their own sense of femininity, so no need for conforming with patriarchal stereotypes?

Again, just my guess. If I’m wrong: please explain. I’m always willing to learn & evolve.