He should just point a flock camera at his house. Then he’ll be 80% safer based on a study I just made up like the ones on their sales pitch.

I mean, he asked the child sex trafficker to let him visit rape island…

Call it a prompt injection bug, but that doesn’t mean the statement isn’t true.

There is literally no point in this company’s history that it wasn’t the villain. Even if they only did what they claimed, it’s still a shit company.

The biggest flaw, aside from it having to succeed in our corporate owned Congress, is that it would require these companies to actually make money, and based on the technology we have today, that seems unlikely to happen anytime in the next decade. At least not without some major technological breakthrough. But it’s better than nothing I suppose.

Since I didn’t see it mentioned there’s also Gatus.

Microslop is openly anti consumer. Why would you hand them your encryption keys?

Sounds like something a pedophile would say.

Man it must be rough out there for regular people that put up with that kind of bullshit.

Ah yes, who needs fiber when you have an inferior product that will be worse in every calculable way?

Pay no attention to the person who stands to benefit from this deal. There’s definitely nothing illegal about it.

So what if the owner of Starlink just happened to spend a quarter of a billion dollars to get the current president elected? That surely has nothing to do with the abysmal Starlink service stealing away funding for critical infrastructure.