If I’m understanding correctly, this is saying that isolation between different clients on the same VLAN is broken? But this attack doesn’t break isolation between VLANs?
So the major issue is if you’ve got a guest network on the same VLAN as your main network
I’ve been the car driver who nearly made jam out of the cyclist in the last panel. I’ve also been the cyclist hit by a car which was driving in the cycle lane.
Bad road users are everywhere and they use all sorts of transportation. Let’s stop with the division and generalisation.
Finances aside, it’s still not selfish.
We (uk scout group) use g suite or whatever they call it these days. The Google connection isn’t ideal, but we get it completely free, the t&cs and level of control over it are a lot better than consumer gmail/drive, the learning curve for techphobic users is about as shallow as possible, and we don’t have to spend volunteer time on maintaining the platform. So definitely worth it for us but your situation may vary.
It would be interesting to know how much of this is because the same factors which trigger care proceedings are also likely to harm the mother, and how much is because the care proceedings cause the harm. Either way, it’s a big number and clearly more support needs to be available.
I think we also have to remember that the care proceedings are there to protect the child, and in theory are already a last resort after support has failed. Though I’m sure there’s work to be done to improve that in practice.