Wait a second. My point was only the TS` points were wrong at least for the “protests in Russia” simply because the photo are 9th May pride and the state backed action. You can check it by yourself by finding original pictures and checking the background story.
Sem
I am a software engineer living and working in Belgrade, Serbia. My hobbies contain a lot of things including cycling, bikepacking, photography. My political view are closer to left-wing anarchism.
All the photos are made by myself (if not specified other) and are shared under CC-BY 4.0.
- 0 Posts
- 8 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
Cake day: April 27th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
As one who was born in Russia and have been living there for 30 years until 2022 when the shitty government started the brutal invasion to Ukraine, I see this completely different. Russia is far away from socialism and is reuled by oligarchs. All the praise to Soviet Union is about only war propaganda to justify the imperial wars organized by Putin and his friends oligarchs.
2d photo about Russia is a procession orfanize by regime. Jfyi, Putin himself participated in it. 100% not “russians fighting against regime”.
How can you prove to conspiracy theorist that he is wrong while conspiracy theory does not fulfill the falsifiability criteria by definition? Like everything that can proove that the conspiracy theorist is wrong just marked as CIA propaganda / Masonic manipulation / Government is hiding / whatever? I mean if the theory accepts only facts that proove it and rejects any facts that do not, this “theory” cannot make mistakes by definition, can it?
301·3 months agoI read the whole article and did not find an answer for a very simple question: what are benefits for users? The whole speech is about how we CAN put agents to all the devices, etc. without answering the simple question WHY should we do it. There are a lot of words about how can google and friends use the data for advertising. But nothing about motivation of users to allow it. He is talking about economical reasons but it will work if and only if users will have economical reasons to put agents on their devices. As of today I do not see a lot of usage of autonomous agents outside of the professional work like software development or ms word automation. What are reasons for people to make these agents a part of their life? The whole speech is built on top of the assumption that happens without a word about why should it. Am I missing something?
According to the Movember Foundation, a leading men’s health organization and partner of UN Women, two-thirds of young men regularly engage with masculinity influencers online.
While some content offers genuine support, much of it promotes extreme language and sexist ideology, reinforcing the idea that men are victims of feminism and modern social change.
So, 2/3 of young men are risking to become incels, right? Because it is hard to imagine a young girl who is looking for a partner with hyperfocus on his own masculinity as well as a partner, who portraits himself as victim? That is sad…
I was living in Russia this time and I recognized the photo. And because I as a local have a context, I left a comment that the second photo in a row is misleading.