There also were more than two PC platforms (and we barely have two now; Apple was pretty close to going away too). I miss being the Atari ST guy in a circle of people who all had different types of computers. It didn’t last very long but it was way more fun.
Yeah on mobile I think it’s okay. Still a bit overloaded but a far cry from what Japanese web pages can be like on desktop browsers. Sometimes they’re like web design stopped in 1999 and since then all they did was add more blinky banners around the actual content.
That’s fine. All I’m saying is that the article claims that their stance is an eight year old can waive rights, while also claiming indirectly that the mother waived the rights too. Because it says that she placed parental controls on the account, which in the case of Roblox means she made an account for herself and agreed to the same terms.
I have no idea whether the terms are enforceable or not. I’m only commenting on the article sensationalizing by making it look like the company says the 8 year old agreeing to their terms is enough.
Although maybe one thing to add could be that the child could not have gotten access to chat either without the mother enabling it for her. The article makes it sound like children are immediately exposed to all sorts of things on Roblox but the reality is unverified accounts are heavily restricted, and for a child, the restrictions have to be disabled by a parent.
Is it their stance? The article says the mother “placed parental controls” on the child’s account. This means the mother had an account too and agreed to the terms as well.
Do you know if the microphone can be disabled? Or the features that use it? Basically I’d want glasses like these that primarily react to inputs I make on my phone or show things the phone can figure out based on my location etc. I’d want to be 100% certain no audio is being recorded or even uploaded to a translation service.
The bot argument is valid but the OS X thing could just be because most browsers on macOS report “Mac OS X” in the User-Agent string for compatibility (and 10.15 as the version regardless of the actual OS version, for privacy reasons).
There are smart glasses without camera that can do translation. So there are some options.
I think not understanding what they’re committing is more dangerous than before
This kind of reasoning applies to every new tool. 20 years ago I was saying the same thing about work from co-workers who started programming on Java and didn’t understand what their beloved HashMap actually does under the hood.
Eventually we adapt to either the new tools or to the new dangers, the ones who don’t just become fossils.
I always thought security questions were dangerous, but I did in fact not know that quizzes that exploit them exist in the wild.
The Apple office apps are still free, but they do have an add-on subscription too now.
Apparently he’s 63. So he would have played in the streets in 1960ies Taiwan or Thailand. Both countries where most people couldn’t afford cars at the time.
Here in Germany, we can still play in the streets in 2026. We have streets designated for it.
Nowadays agents like Claude Code can run autonomously for hours just given a goal description. It doesn’t take a lot of human effort at all to set up a bunch of sessions, and these companies don’t limit how many instances you run in parallel. Agents can also spawn sub-agents that run in parallel if a task calls for parallelization. Whether all this produces good results is a different story, especially if you don’t put enough effort into the goal description. But burning tokens as such is not difficult.
Even workflows where you’re just chatting with an agent can burn a lot of tokens. When you’re chatting with an LLM, the entire history becomes part of the input each time you send something. This also applies to tool calls, so if the agent decides to read 20 files before it can work on your request that’s 20 times a file gets added to the history and 20 times that entire growing history is then sent back as input to drive the agent’s next step.
Coding is more affected by this than many other applications because even a new conversation tends to start with the agent gathering a bunch of source code files, and then the response to a task is not just a bunch of text once, but a sequence of tool calls to make edits across files, build, run tests, react to test failures, and so on, all for one actual human prompt - but in reality a back-and-forth between the LLM and the harness with a quickly growing history.
Wondering how much the AC could even do if the door is left open. But maybe the hassle is also having to turn it on again every time?
That but also if you’re not training and hosting your own model, your scanner is just subject to the same restrictions that your LLM provider applies to you on top of all the architectural problems.
1 in base 10 isn’t 1/10 and in hexadecimal it’s not 1/16.
Decimal integers in base pi are 1, 2, 3, 10.2201…, 11.2201…, 12.2201…, 20.2201… and so on.
Basically: 10.2201… = 1 * pi^1 + 0 * pi^0 + 2 * pi^-1 + 2 * pi^-2 … which approaches 4 as you add digits.
But 1 is just 1*pi^0
It’s not user replaceable but it’s not actually that hard to replace it, so this basically just takes work away from all those little repair shops. Still good for customers but probably not much of a difference for Nintendo.
None of them are profitable, they’re all selling their services at a loss
I think they have one (also built in India, but not sure which markets it’s sold in other than EU).
With Codeberg the main risk is that they’re a small non-profit that depends on donations, so they could run out of money. That doesn’t allow them to act against their bylaws, but it could affect availability of the service.
Personally I would choose Codeberg because their services are hosted in the EU (Germany).
I thought the (former) VP in charge of it left for OpenAI not long ago.