1. He helps her answer a question.
2. She rewards him with sex.
3. He now does her work for her cause he’s pussy-whipped.

How many users are required for a “classifieds” website to remain profitable, if say most abandon the “social” part? Make no mistake, it’s dying.
The answer might be that it obviously depends on how companies many still pump advertising budget into it.
But the advertising budget 20% rule has been fucked up since 2007, I think.
And it seems to be being readdressed currently.
Wrongly again, likely . But currently.

Given the demand, it’s not unreasonable to think they could just as easily sell compute to OpenAI or Claude or whoever the domestic flavour of the month is…
So the question is, are they doing this to avoid admitting defeat?
Answer is obviously no, if they’d use a Chinese model. That is admission of defeat I itself.
So then, it is outsourcing more clever models than they know how to produce.
And then, the AI stigma plus the anti-China stigma works against them.
I think Facebook will be the first to fall.
Divest immediately.

🎶down there at the pawn shop it’s the only way to shop 🎶

My wife said it.

Congrats!

I’ll ask my wife…
She says your an idiot. I"m not saying that… She is, but might be periomenopause .

My wife had to explain this to me.

I down voted, which is an upvote in Aus.

There’s no drink. How they not include the drink?

Maybe we can just be friends, and the AI’s get enjoyment from helping their buds out.

Give em booze and ciggies then

Poor fella. Put nvidia on food stamps I guess.

What if Claude was one’s only friend, though?
Asking for a Claude friend.

Hire a barbershop quartet to sing it to them.

Of you pay rent on credit, you should move into a cardboard box. I would.

If you can’t run a machine at home then you can’t self-host. You’re welcome to cloud-host though.

TUIF!

Straw-man argument bud. You may as well be house press secretary. You said it yourself. “Its inherently undemocratic and unethical to do less work someone [else].”
An while you’re not technically correct about that either, the person you’re describing that did no work is the one who sells their bathwater in this meme.
Come on… I know you can do it… Your brain only has little bit more to go and you’ll get it.

I can understand when one might be upset about the state of the world. Who isn’t, eh? Comrade?
But no, your 100% hypethetical revelation that those people must inherently mistreat or underpay their staff, without any other context is a ridiculous leap. There is no question who adds more value, because of the way value is added. It is the way it is, because of the way it is.
Lawers can be skeezy.
Tech startup bros can be skeezy.
Hookers can be skeezy.
The care worker that takes care of your kids, could be skeezy. They are individuals. There will always be those people.
The professions are not inherently evil. There would be a version of them in any type of society whether it be fascist, socialist, communist, capitalist, or otherwise.
And they should always need to be performed open and honestly enough to have public approval of the processes.
There also will always be some form of prostitution.
But that can be done in a back alley.
And that’s why it doesn’t have much as much value.