• barfplanet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    If Lyft and Uber are doing this then I genuinely applaud them. That’s astounding ingenuity in screwing over their customers. True innovators.

    • BigDiction@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The people making the big bucks in Silicon Valley are often the people really good at understanding psychology and manipulating people’s behavior.

      I honestly would have never thought of this either. I’m one of those traditional losers who thinks providing a good value/service at a sustainable margin is a good way to run a business.

    • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because they pay apple? I’d imagine that’s obvious. It’s more useful metrics for the developer. I would be surprised if they didn’t tier the information access about users behind closed doors.

      Android’s not perfect, but at least permissions can be set per app, you can root your device, or install GrapheneOS or Lineage to bypass this crap entirely.

      • bobs_monkey@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d rather the ability to fudge these stats to developers, cause my info is none of their damn business when I’m paying for a service.

        • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That can be done on android and other operating systems. Apple is always the SOL option when it comes to dodging this crap.

      • phx@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        some permissions can be set per app. I’m not sure battery level is one of those and I have apps (i.e. homeassistant) which can read thatwithout me actually having explicitly allowed it. Usually it’s stuff one pictures/files, location, camera or health data that are restricted

    • Coldcell@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, next they’re going to reveal they’ve been mining your calendar data this whole time after a data breach forces them to admit it.

  • kimara@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The article doesn’t say they do this. It says: “In theory, a service could charge you more if you’re on a vacation in a foreign country, instead of your hometown, because they know you would be willing to pay more. It would be the same if your phone’s battery is low and you’re trying to get home.”

    A really bad headline, but not surprising I guess.

  • xxce2AAb@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Look, does it really matter whether they do or not? If a company is morally bankrupt enough to conduct business like this in the first place, it’s a certainty they’ll just find some other novel way to be flaming assholes.

    If you don’t want to get cheated, stop doing business with thieves and liars.

    • MurrayL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Personally, I’d rather have a robust and up-to-date set of consumer protections rather than leaving everything up to ‘buyer beware’.

      • xxce2AAb@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        That would be ideal of course, but this is the US we’re talking about, so it seems unlikely that you’ll have them.