Take over? Not llms. Destroy the world by accelerating climate change? Absolutely.
I get the spirit, but it’s capitalism that accelerates climate change. LLMs are just the new blockchain scapegoat.
You’re both right. Capitalism accelerates climate change but so does the outrageous electricity requirements of LLMs.
Many human activities cause climate change. LLMs are a relatively new one, and a disproportionate energy user, so it’s fair enough to shout about it and try to minimise adoption. Things that are already entrenched like consumer culture or aviation will be harder and slower to undo.
Also, whether it’s right or not that capitalism is largely to blame, if you take that to mean that the only useful action against climate change is fighting against capitalism, or let yourself feel like you’ve ‘done your part’ by having anticapitalist opinions, I think that’s counterproductive.
If it weren’t for Capitalism, those LLMs would have been designed with a lower climate impact from the get-go. But since that hurts the shareholders bottom line, they aren’t.
People with no clue about AI are exactly why a dumb-as-a-brick LLM could very well end up destroying the world.
AI will not take over. OpenAI on the other hand…
An AI that plays Elden Ring, I see.
The thing is, AI doesn’t need to take over the world if the BiG tHiNkErS are so eager to replace humans regardless of its merit.
The thing is, if they’re wrong, their businesses will fail, and anyone who didn’t jump on the hype train and didn’t piss revenue away should have better financials
AI does not exist. Large language models are not intelligent, they are language models.
