• SpaceDuck@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    4 months ago

    Look I think these prices are unsustainable, but the article basically says nvidia 1.4pct down and then goes to a non ai company being down. It’s a dramatic title, not a dramatic plunge.

    • A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Hm, thanks for confirming my skepticism I guess.

      Still, even the existence of such articles gives a little hope that the bubble might burst.

  • rf_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    The market is finally starting to question if there will be an ROI to all the capex.

  • andallthat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 months ago

    There’s a financial bubble and a mental bubble. They are related and feed each other but they are not the same and might not blow up at the same time.

    The Market, according to the article, isn’t losing its faith in AI as the Ultimate Technology (the mental bubble or “AI psychosis”). It’s just questioning its belief that one or two companies might be able to squeeze massive profits out of it (the financial bubble).

    Investors thought one AI winner would emerge relatively quickly, a new SuperGoogle or HyperAmazon that would make all the money in the world by providing access to AI to every other company. The AI winner would then gleefully enshittify their product while making it more expensive over time, eventually turning huge profits (even including the Trillions of investment spent to get there).

    Now, with multiple companies that are offering an almost equivalent product and are forced to compete on price while already bleeding billions every quarter, everyone might just run out of money before the winner is declared. Not a scenario many are willing to invest in.

    But the idea that AI can do everyone’s job or give anyone 100x superpowers will still be out there. And all the CEOs and CTOs who thought they would look like thought leaders if they bet everything on AI will not easily change their minds all at once. They will still be easy marks for the next snake oil salesman, selling them a product based on cheap, less powerful models or whatever they can insist can still perform the 100x miracle at an actually bearable cost.

    Some might actually be useful products, it’s just that if the mental bubble, overinflating what AI can do doesn’t blow, they can still be sold way above their actual worth.

  • zurohki@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 months ago

    We need to be hearing AI customers saying “This is so great, we’re going to double our AI spend next year!”

    We’re actually hearing “What’s the ROI on this? We’re looking to cut back.”

    That’s just not consistent with the exponential growth OpenAI and Anthropic need to survive.

    • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      That’s just not consistent with the exponential growth OpenAI and Anthropic need to survive.

      I honestly can’t think of a worse business model than needing exponential growth just to survive.