Regretful cities aren’t sure how to cancel their surveillance contracts, so they are literally covering their cameras.

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Welp. It’s too bad the shitty hotel I used to work at got shut down by the city.

        We had TONS of meth heads that would be very appriciative of that information.

      • potoooooooo 🥔@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Really though, don’t do the precious metals part, cuz that’s what will get you caught. Carefully destroying them? Very doable, I strongly suspect.

        • Barbecue Cowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          The precious metals content realistically isn’t interesting at all unfortunately. You could make a bit reselling the internal components (like probably not even 3 digits), but the value on the actual copper/etc is negligible. The solar panel is probably the most interesting piece, but the components are cheap as fuck.

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      They don’t just collect video either. Audio, network traffic, Bluetooth devices, tons of electronic intelligence can still be gotten with covered cameras

  • vagrancyand@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    5 months ago

    Fun fact the panel, inverter, and battery set up in these do not have any tracking features, that’s all in the internals for the camera controller. It’s enough to charge any smart phone or tablet if someone you know is living outside and should have a need of that. You do not need anything more than a Philips head screwdriver for most versions, and a security bit for others, both of which you can have for pennies at any hardware store.

  • otp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 months ago

    the city was sharing Flock camera data for immigration enforcement

    Ah, these are in American cities.

    apparently on accident,

    Oh yes, definitely American.

    (Yes I know I skipped over the part about Ohio)

  • rose56@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Do also the other thing, where you brake it apart. Same thing, but it’s permanently.

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      I read the beginning of the title as “Cities are Cowering” and now I think it could easily be a part of an alternate title.

      Like your the damn government… Just remove the devices, tell Flock where they can pick them up in the next two weeks otherwise they will be sold as is on open market and pay the termination fee or potential lawsuit. Cities get sued like all the time and I am confident even a moderately competent lawyer could find a cheap way out.

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      They are the city. They can send public works out there to dismantle the cameras and then send Flock the bill for it, if they are unwilling to dismantle themselves.

    • Pika@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      honestly idk why they bothered covering them. just disconnect them… as long as they aren’t damaged I doubt flock could seek anything on it.

          • SparroHawc@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Only connected with cinch straps. They don’t have any wire connection to the pole. That’s what makes them so easy to place all around a city; they’re just throwing them onto pre-existing poles.

      • em2@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        likely safer if they ever get caught. it’s not damaging property if there’s simply a trash bag over it.

  • addie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’d like to think that the bag is step 1. Step 2 is to balance an old car tire on top, and set it on fire.

      • felbane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago
        1. City installs trash bags because they’re contractually obligated to keep the devices installed and powered on
        2. Someone hosts an impromptu Office Space fan meetup, with a fun reenactment of the printer scene
        3. City sees this, responds with an obvious but legally non-actionable tweet response suggesting it continue (e.g. “Fartsburg loves Mike Judge films, too! So nice to see our citizens enjoying the various forms of recreation and socialization ths city has to offer.”), along with some conspicuously-placed garbage cans near all of the cameras’ installed locations.
        4. ???
        5. (No) Profit. (for Flock)
  • MrKoyun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Why aren’t they just… Removing them?

    Oh. Its probably because removing them is unnecessarily complicated so they need the company to come do it for them.

  • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is an better idea. I was going to shoot them with a paintball gun.

      • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Some of the cameras by me are a little high up, which is why initially I thought paintball.

        I bet I could fly a drone with a trash bag over it though.