- cross-posted to:
- mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/52274500
You must log in or register to comment.
I want to know where they think this will go, because there is an obvious and looming problem: the content–the library–wasn’t made or at least hosted for free.
Somebody set up a website to host the interactions between people who knew things and people who wanted to learn things. The people exchanging information often got as much as they gave, and the person hosting the forum typically sold ads or information about the people participating in the discussions. The result was a virtuous cycle where content gets made and everyone is happy.
Now all those sites are scraped, and their information is regurgitated by slop bots into a “zero click search” where the creators of the information have no role, the seekers of information never encountered the source, and the hosts never get their slice of the pie. OK, well that works for now, but what about when something new is made and there’s no forum to talk about it because all forums get scraped into the slop machine? How will the slop center learn? Are we supposed to expect the AI companies will spend time meticulously testing how best to DIY a mass spectrometer or whatever?
Lol they aren’t thinking about where it will go, they are think about making fat stacks off the labour of others. No the companies aren’t making any money, but the people involved certainly are. When those companies fail those people won’t be held accountable and they will keep most of the money they’ve extracted from the system.
This is particularly, transparently obvious for news sites. News is worthless if it is old. Yet still AI literally reads the work of journalists and then cuts them out of the equation, denying the journalists the revenue that pays them to produce the news. Its like the scorpion and the frog.
MIT license in a nutshell?
mit license requires attribution. ai companies don’t attribute properly.
Don’t worry, your own peers are on the frontlines standing against you lmao
… Humor?
Here’s the best part:
They spent trillions building a product worth billions. They don’t even get a moat of it either. All their competitors are perpetually 6 months behind, so they have to keep spending billions more just to keep their heads above water.
Their only hope is to trick the government into regulatory capture so they can finally get their moat. They aren’t even profiting from inference though, so they’re going to continue burning runway.
I don’t disagree but I’m curious what government regulation can do to create that moat? What are they trying to get out of the recent fearmongering, I can’t figure out what the end goal is
I think it’s to put a regulatory limitation on local run models, these frontiers companies might argue that such a technology which can be self run by a regular user would be disastrous and they want the government to regulate the release of these local models cough Chinese distilled models cough, hence regulating every other new ai companies. Oh these American companies are exempt because they are the moral companies who would never do anything disastrous.
So it’s kinda a way to snuff the small competitors companies so they can slow down their cash burning (they need to throw in millions every day to keep ahead of the local models) so they can at last finally raise price for their products since there is no competition. So basically it’s a fuckin cartel that need government help to make profit
I don’t think it would work out well for americans, not that this administration cares though. They might do it regardless
Unless they can get other countries to stop using the local models, American companies will have a much harder time competing if everyone else can use cheaper and more efficient models while they need to use expensive american ones.
I don’t think it would work out well for americans
Most “pro-business” legislation doesn’t.
not that
this administrationthe leadership of either major party cares though. Theymightalmost certainly will do it regardlessFixed that for you. The likes of Schumer, Jeffries, Durbin, and Klobuchar are in on it too.
And not even the Russian plant in the white house gives a shit about them.
They killed Aaron Schwartz for scraping academic papers.
Fuck. This cuts in a whole new way.
Also every non-programmer is mad at the people who built those tutorials, instead of the ones stealing.
Can you explain what you mean?
Is the same thing that happened to academia. The people submitting papers are paying for the privilege, the people reviewing them are volunteers, and the cost to read them is out of reach for many. The people making money are just maintaining the website.
Believe it or not, Epstein connects to that… or at least Ghislane Maxwell’s dad (Robert Maxwell)
Couldn’t this easily be solved by one university building a platform?
I understand there’s a need to verify people actually are who they are and have credibility on the topic they review.
So starting out utilising uni logins or something alike, and you’ll have all university professors included
Why would you restrict who’s allowed to read the publications based on the “credibility” of the reader?
That’s not the problem, the problem is that the journals legally restrict you from making your publication openly accessible.
Not read, but if you peer review something outside of your field. Experts should be able to see you’re off field and not assign the same level of credibility to that peer review
I just reviewed a paper for a major journal and felt bad for participating, but what else are we to do? Submit everything to arxiv, but when asked to review, seems you should review
They paved paradise, and put up a parking lot…
Even worse. They destroyed the library and are now charging people money for telling them what was in those books, often providing an answer that is incorrect.
They destroyed the books and kept all the opinion columns.
This isn’t programmer humor though… this is a sad reality.
Capitalism ruins everything eventually
I’ll pay you half a trump dollar to take that back
The law locks up the man or woman
Who steals the goose from off the common
But leaves the greater villain loose
Who steals the common from the goose.
The law demands that we atone
When we take things we do not own
But leaves the lords and ladies fine
Who take things that are yours and mine.
The poor and wretched don’t escape
If they conspire the law to break;
This must be so but they endure
Those who conspire to make the law.
The law locks up the man or woman
Who steals the goose from off the common
And geese will still a common lack
Till they go and steal it backThanks for posting this.
It’s increasing the value, you see, because before the information was free, which by the laws of supply and demand means it was worthless. It’s much more economically efficient this way, as it contributes to GDP! /s
Then use open source and open-weight AI models and stop fucking complaining, you dull twit!
That doesn’t stop the damage the Silicon tech bros are doing
We built the library
Shame you forgot to take ownership of it.
